Site Assessment
Each property must be evaluated on an individual basis to determine the opportunities and
constraints allowing for various sustainability systems. What I mean by systems would include
primarily advanced Permaculture systems and rainwater catchment systems.
Any property regardless of its site characteristics can use less water by implementing any of the
water saving techniques and "smart irrigation systems".
In order for us to be good environmental stewards for our own piece of land, we must look at
what has been done to the natural landscape upon which our house is built.
We all live in different regions, each with their own environmental characteristics that form the
opportunities and constraints within which we can become stewards of the earth. Some of us live in
rural areas where the impact on the environment is much less than the urban areas. Let’s compare
the major differences between rural areas and urban areas.
|
Rural
Lower population densities
Fewer planned developments
More natural open space
Fewer commercial developments
Not as much pavement, highways
More indigenous populations of wildlife
Zoning tends to be less restrictive
Usually has areas where people living in the cities escape to, relax and get back
to “nature”
Slower lifestyles, less traffic, more farming
Can sometimes be remote with limited access to resources, utilities and other
people
|
Urban
Higher densities of populations
More freeways, streets, concrete and pavement
Less natural open space
Abundance of commercial and industrial development
Wildlife habitat encroached upon by development
Government priority typically favors development, more housing and
growth
More impact on groundwater resources
More reliance on inter-state energy sources
More psycho-social anxieties due to the higher populations, i.e. crime, competition
and a consumer driven society
|
An urban subdivision often has no natural habitat left over after the grading and infrastructure
improvements are installed. Even if the zoning laws are in place to conserve open space, sometimes
open space requirements can be met by creating green parks with grass and play areas rather than
truly conserving natural habitat.
The typical result is that the average homeowner is given a property with a piece of land where all
the natural vegetation is gone, thus forcing the homeowner to create that which they lost if they
choose to do so. Many homeowners choose to create a human needs focused landscape that is rich in
manmade structures, exotic plants, excessive water use and which is no more than an extension of
their indoor living environment. This is simply human nature. Not everyone shares the values of the
eco-friendly consumer who buys a piece of property untouched by developers and carefully sites
their home to protect the environment with minimal impact.
In urban areas, the lifestyle of choice often accepts the destruction of natural areas by
rationalizing the close access to nearby streams, fishing and the mountains…The priority is placed
on the needs of human society and the use of nature is at its mercy for protection or destruction.
We go to sleep at night knowing there are sufficient National Parks and Forests that are preserved
in perpetuity for humankind and future generations.
But there are those of us who do not sleep at night and are concerned about the wonton destruction
of natural areas containing natural resources, wildlife and watersheds. We are torn between our
selfish motives and our yearning to be one with Nature although we allow our fellow neighbors to
exercise their Constitutional rights to develop private property because, heck after all,
“everybody needs a place to live”…
If we are fortunate enough to live on a piece of land where there are still remnants of natural
vegetation and habitat, we can work with our site characteristics and recreate a rich ecosystem in
which we can cohabitate and be good environmental stewards. As we do our own part on our own land,
we as a community will improve the overall ecology of our regions and become teachers to other
communities who are still learning the wise ways of environmental stewardship.
Most homes and landscapes fall into either one of two categories: existing
landscape or new installation. The existing landscape situation must be assessed as to what works
and what does not. Whether certain systems can be modified or need to be completely rebuilt and
whether the plants and trees can be left as is or modified, transplanted or removed entirely due to
being so inappropriate, that to leave them would result in an eyesore or just would not fit with
the new scheme.
|